Balance tests after knee replacement can help explain why standing still feels comfortable while turning, walking on uneven ground, or responding to an unexpected change still requires extra attention. Different tests examine different parts of balance, so a strong score on one assessment does not answer every question.

Prefer to listen? Play Episode 23 below for the complete discussion.

Balance tests after knee replacement examine different systems

Balance depends on strength, sensation, vision, vestibular information from your inner ear, coordination, reaction speed, joint motion, and the ability to shift weight. Pain, swelling, altered walking, fear of falling, neuropathy, medication effects, and other health conditions can influence one or more of these systems.

A test is selected according to the question being asked. Some assessments emphasize maintaining a position. Others examine movement, sensory changes, stepping reactions, or walking while the task becomes more complex.

Scores should be interpreted by a qualified healthcare professional who understands the test’s instructions, scoring rules, reliability, limitations, and relevance to your situation. They are not designed as unsupervised challenges to try at home.

What the Berg Balance Scale examines

The Berg Balance Scale includes 14 tasks involving sitting, standing, transfers, reaching, turning, narrowing the base of support, and standing on one leg. It provides a broad picture of how someone maintains balance during common positions and controlled movements.

The Berg has been widely used and studied. It may be useful when a therapist wants to examine foundational balance abilities or monitor someone with clear difficulty during basic standing and transfers.

However, a person can perform well on many Berg tasks while still feeling uncertain during rapid turns, changing speeds, obstacle negotiation, or unexpected loss of balance. A high score does not prove that every real-world balance demand is easy or safe.

A balance score describes performance under specific test conditions. It does not summarize every surface, speed, distraction, or unexpected event encountered in daily life.

Research involving people after total knee arthroplasty has found differences in how responsive various balance tests are to change. The Berg may show ceiling effects in people whose basic balance has improved while more complex limitations remain.

What the Mini-BESTest adds

The Mini-BESTest examines four areas: anticipatory control, reactive postural control, sensory orientation, and dynamic gait. These categories address how your body prepares for movement, responds to a balance disturbance, uses sensory information, and controls balance while walking.

Tasks may involve rising onto the toes, standing on one leg, responding to controlled external perturbations, standing under changing sensory conditions, altering walking speed, turning the head while walking, pivoting, and stepping over an obstacle.

These activities require trained administration and appropriate guarding. Reactive stepping and altered sensory conditions can create fall risk. Reading the test instructions is not equivalent to receiving a safe assessment.

For ongoing explanations of testing and function, join the free Total Knee Success Insider. It provides practical education that can help you prepare questions for your own appointments.

Why two balance tests can tell different stories

Someone may demonstrate steady standing and transfers on the Berg while losing points on the Mini-BESTest during quick turns, reactive stepping, or walking with head movement. That combination does not make either test incorrect. It shows that quiet balance and dynamic balance are related but not identical.

The reverse context also matters. A person with substantial difficulty standing or transferring may not need the most complex test first. The therapist chooses an assessment that is safe, appropriate, and capable of detecting the type of change expected.

Other measures may be added when needed. Gait speed, the Timed Up and Go, chair-rise tests, the Functional Gait Assessment, strength testing, and patient-reported confidence can provide information that a single balance score cannot.

Repeated testing should use the same standardized method whenever possible. Changes in footwear, instructions, guarding, assistive-device use, or scoring can affect the result. A meaningful comparison requires more than remembering that the latest number was higher.

How results can guide a plan

If anticipatory control is limited, treatment may emphasize preparing for weight shifts and transitions. Difficulty with reactive control may lead to professionally supervised stepping practice. Sensory limitations may change how surfaces, lighting, footwear, vision, or vestibular factors are addressed. Dynamic gait findings may guide work on turning, obstacles, speed changes, and dual-task walking.

The exercise plan should be based on the assessment, not copied from the test itself. Repeatedly practicing test items can improve familiarity without addressing the underlying limitation or preparing for the variety of real environments.

Testing is information, not a label

A balance result can establish a baseline, document change, identify a specific limitation, or support a decision about further assessment. It cannot guarantee that someone will or will not fall. Falls are influenced by health, medications, vision, environment, attention, footwear, urgency, and exposure to challenging situations.

The Knee Replacement Game Plan™ includes functional testing and preparation concepts designed to help people understand their starting point before surgery. The book is coming soon, and its page includes a notification signup.

Join the free Total Knee Success Insider for practical knee replacement education, new podcast episodes, and helpful resources. You can also sign up using the form at the bottom of this page.

Educational disclaimer: This article provides general educational information and does not provide diagnosis, fall-risk clearance, treatment, or an individualized balance program. Do not perform the Berg Balance Scale, Mini-BESTest, reactive stepping, eyes-closed standing, or other balance challenges without appropriate professional assessment, setup, and guarding.

References

1. Chan ACM, Pang MYC. Assessing balance function in patients with total knee arthroplasty. Phys Ther. 2015;95(10):1397-1407. doi:10.2522/ptj.20140486.
2. Chan ACM, Ouyang XH, Jehu DAM, Chung RCK, Pang MYC. Recovery of balance function among individuals with total knee arthroplasty: comparison of responsiveness among four balance tests. Gait Posture. 2018;59:267-271. doi:10.1016/j.gaitpost.2017.10.020.
3. Chan ACM, Pang MYC. Minimal clinically important difference of four commonly used balance assessment tools in individuals after total knee arthroplasty: a prospective cohort study. PM R. 2020;12(3):238-245. doi:10.1002/pmrj.12226.
4. Orange GM, Hince DA, Travers MJ, et al. Physical function following total knee arthroplasty for osteoarthritis: a longitudinal systematic review with meta-analysis. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2025;55(1):1-11. doi:10.2519/jospt.2024.12570.
5. Na A, Oppermann LM, Jupiter DC, et al. Diabetes mellitus blunts the symptoms, physical function, and health-related quality of life benefits of total knee arthroplasty. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2021;51(6):269-280. doi:10.2519/jospt.2021.9515.
6. Duong V, Dennis S, Ferreira ML, et al. Predictors of adherence to a step count intervention following total knee replacement. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2022;52(9):620-630.
7. Gränicher P, Mulder L, Lenssen T, et al. Prehabilitation improves knee functioning before and within the first year after total knee arthroplasty. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2022;52(11):709-725.
8. Minick KI, Hunter SJ, Capin JJ, et al. Improved outcomes following care guideline implementation. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2023;53(3):143-150.
9. Capin JJ, Minick KI, Stevens-Lapsley JE, et al. Variation in outcomes and number of visits following care guideline implementation. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2023;53(3):151-160.
10. Dandis R, et al. Latent class analysis to predict outcomes of early high-intensity physical therapy after total knee arthroplasty. Phys Ther. 2021;101(5):pzab040. doi:10.1093/ptj/pzab040.
11. Goff AJ, Donaldson A, de Oliveira Silva D, et al. Education priorities of physical therapists for people with knee osteoarthritis. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2022;52(9):607-619.
12. Bricca A, Roos EM, et al. Exercise therapy wears down my knee joint: myth or reality? J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2025;55(7):463-476.